| Pages: 1 [2] |
21. [Announcment] The Monocle Clubhouse - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It's like no one wants to tell you guys . . . I know it's hard to hear. It's like trying to tell the saggy-pants guy: "You don't look cool, or down, or hip. You look like you need a belt. And a job." Truth hurts, I know. But it will be best th...
- by MetaMorpheus Jones - at 2012.12.24 19:16:00
|
22. Love. This. Game. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I would just like to say thank you to CCP, the devs, GMs, ISDs, CSM. Your hard work and dedication to our playground is very much appreciated by this pilot. I've been gaming since Pong. Nothing even comes close to the energy, the thrill, the pure...
- by MetaMorpheus Jones - at 2012.12.24 16:36:00
|
23. Hiding in Eve- Why We Cloak - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rather than implement this as a radical change to the EVE universe, and because it is based almost entirely on equipment and skill (rather than a "fix" per se of a game mechanic), this could be introduced in phases over time, as newly developed te...
- by MetaMorpheus Jones - at 2012.06.07 04:53:00
|
24. Hiding in Eve- Why We Cloak - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mors Sanctitatis wrote: In addition to information, sharing it is just as important. Where Corps and Alliances will really benefit is in the sharing of information. If you're in a gang and you have a CovOps pilot with you, what if everything hi...
- by MetaMorpheus Jones - at 2012.06.06 22:05:00
|
25. HiSec security is CCP's responsibility. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote: Alright well 70% then whatever, I was pointing out that you were wrong when you said 70% did not live in highsec when you clearly just proved yourself wrong by stating they do. Except that you're st...
- by MetaMorpheus Jones - at 2012.06.01 20:29:00
|
26. HiSec security is CCP's responsibility. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: It is not CCP's job to 'make highsec secure'. It's their job to implement a system where there are a series of consequences that are effected upon aggressors within hisec space (loss of ship, loss of security status). ...
- by MetaMorpheus Jones - at 2012.06.01 19:15:00
|
27. HiSec security is CCP's responsibility. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Scatim Helicon wrote: MetaMorpheus Jones wrote: nullsec corps can defend their space with absolute impunity. Hisec residence cannot. If they're in highsec, its not "their space", it belongs to one of the NPC factions, and they don't much c...
- by MetaMorpheus Jones - at 2012.06.01 18:20:00
|
28. HiSec security is CCP's responsibility. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: MetaMorpheus Jones wrote: nullsec corps can defend their space with absolute impunity. Hisec residence cannot. If the gankers are systematic, then you can just kill them. If they're a bit more careful, you can wardec them. In...
- by MetaMorpheus Jones - at 2012.06.01 18:10:00
|
29. HiSec security is CCP's responsibility. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: You seem to be making some conflicting assertions here. -Goonswarm is a human-run organization. -ForeverGeddon is an event being sponsored by a human-run organization. -ForeverGeddon involves the use of military power against others in ...
- by MetaMorpheus Jones - at 2012.06.01 17:58:00
|
30. HiSec security is CCP's responsibility. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: MetaMorpheus Jones wrote: Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote: You failed to notice Eve's population has continually increased, except after that Incarna fiasco but it's recovering from that, and all signs form the past point to th...
- by MetaMorpheus Jones - at 2012.06.01 16:59:00
|
31. HiSec security is CCP's responsibility. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lfod Shi wrote: Hi sec = First world Low sec = Second world Null = Third world You can get shot in the streets in all three. You're right. I can get shot in the streets in all three. But the likelyhood that I could get shot in the streets...
- by MetaMorpheus Jones - at 2012.06.01 16:42:00
|
32. HiSec security is CCP's responsibility. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Charles Javeroux wrote: So please tell me once again why should we give away our power, like it has already happened in RL ? By accepting the responsibility on our own security, we are effectively taking back our power and by that we become ma...
- by MetaMorpheus Jones - at 2012.06.01 05:56:00
|
33. HiSec security is CCP's responsibility. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yea, alright, forget the real CCP police, bad idea. It is still fundamentally CCPs space to secure. stoicfaux wrote: Yup, current high-sec mechanics discourage players from helping to enforce the law in high-sec. It's one of the more glaring...
- by MetaMorpheus Jones - at 2012.06.01 05:52:00
|
34. HiSec security is CCP's responsibility. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cannibal Kane wrote: You say CCP employees need to put it's people in the Role of the "Space Police". Your talking about Heads for that sort of thing. Heads means Salaries and their will be a need for many if you are to successfully do somethin...
- by MetaMorpheus Jones - at 2012.06.01 05:46:00
|
35. HiSec security is CCP's responsibility. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote: You failed to notice Eve's population has continually increased, except after that Incarna fiasco but it's recovering from that, and all signs form the past point to that trend continuing In a year, you may say:...
- by MetaMorpheus Jones - at 2012.06.01 05:37:00
|
36. HiSec security is CCP's responsibility. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'll start this off with some relevant information about me: My account is less than a month old. I have lost eight ships and one pod, and every single one of them can be attributed to mistakes I made, either in fitting, in fighting, or both. It h...
- by MetaMorpheus Jones - at 2012.06.01 05:27:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |